Quote:
Originally Posted by FanIn80
Non-passive-aggressive translation: Talbot was better than Hellebuyck, but only because Hellebuyck played very average-at-best. Therefore, Talbot was only slightly above average and should receive no credit beyond that. Also, because of injuries, the only realistic chance we had at winning anyway was if Hallebuyck played better than he did. None of this matters though, since this was only a play-in series and not an actual playoff series.
|
Wow this is a really obnoxious post. So, if I did say that Talbot was lights out, like Ricardo, I could expect to be called a homer because the Flames needed him to steal the series?
What? Give your head a shake. I literally said Talbot was great, and you're now saying that I was actually suggesting he was just above average.
edit: This reply is a lot sloppier than I wanted it to read on 2nd reading, but, I have no idea how to respond to such a bizarre attack where I'm praising your goaltender.