Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
Also Panarin had something like 30 more points than Pettersson. The point is that in addition to having the Hart bona fides that are required to get you into the conversation, Panarin was good at basically everything that's required to be a difference-maker and bad at basically nothing. He could have drawn more penalties... that's about it.
|
Oh, I wasnt making a case that Pettersson should be in the conversation for Hart, don't be silly. I was just making the case that Pettersson is really good and it makes me happy.