Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliche
|
That seems like one worthy of further discussion.
It didn’t seem like anything was illegal and he wasn’t in a position of power, at least in some traditional sense, where he was a gatekeeper or something. I am confused about the “grooming” comments in the article, it kind of insinuates that underage girls were involved, but the article also says he isn’t do anything illegal.
Is he just a womanizer or is there more to it? He’s kind of like an embodiment of restaurants that only hire attractive women, but yet at the same time he doesn’t have any power to hire, fire, promote, etc.