Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew
I have stated many times that I respect Hamonic's decision? Full stop.
I disagree with posters who claim players are taking a "very significant risk of taking the virus home" but mostly I disagree with the arrogance and presumption behind stating whether we agree or disagree with another human being's personal decision about these matters.
I believe I have adequate reading comprehension and don't think I am guilty of the mischaracterization of which you are accusing me. But could you help me? Could you have a career goal that is important enough to you that it is worth more than a non zero risk to your health? Or your family's well being? For this argument, I believe that money does not equal career because I don't like the "how much money is enough" path. And regardless of your answer, if someone were willing to accept more risk than you does that equate to "soulless"?
|
No one said this. Greater risk is not the same as very significant risk.
And of course you could have a career goal that is important enough to you to be worth more than a non zero risk to your health. Again no one said the opposite. You have a tendency to take opposing arguments and make them absolute so that you can refute them.