Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
I think generalizing the views of others and purposely removing or changing the context to make your point does, in general, lead people to making poor conclusions. So, how you arrived here makes sense.
I hardly think comments not-in-favour of taking unnecessary risks, or that money factors into whether risks are necessary, are extreme. These are basics parts of life, don't you think?
It would be helpful to you if you read the many words clarifying these things. But I think we can safely say that the only people here who have shown a lack of respect for someone's personal decision involving their career, are the people who have said they do not respect Hamonic's.
|
I have stated many times that I respect Hamonic's decision? Full stop.
I disagree with posters who claim players are taking a "very significant risk of taking the virus home" but mostly I disagree with the arrogance and presumption behind stating whether we agree or disagree with another human being's personal decision about these matters.
I believe I have adequate reading comprehension and don't think I am guilty of the mischaracterization of which you are accusing me. But could you help me? Could you have a career goal that is important enough to you that it is worth more than a non zero risk to your health? Or your family's well being? For this argument, I believe that money does not equal career because I don't like the "how much money is enough" path. And regardless of your answer, if someone were willing to accept more risk than you does that equate to "soulless"?