Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
Testing is better than not testing. By a very large margin. Obviously.
But staying home is safer than avoiding the group in the first place. (Assuming they are taking the steps at home to remain safe as possible, which is probably a safe assumption for the person we are discussing, based on the choice they made here)
And I had no intention of not being civil - that statement came out snarky but that was not at all my intention. Apologies.
|
Apology 100% accepted. Sorry if I misread you.
1) Living in a controlled environment where those you are in close contact with are being tested regularly.
vs.
2) Staying at home, continuing to have some semblance of contact with outside world including groceries errands etc. with no testing
I think it's debatable which exposes you to more risk and depends on your activities in scenario 2 I guess. Personally, I believe we will see very few positive tests once the players get to Edmonton and TO.