Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
15 of the 19 were Saudi, but 19 of the 19 were all schooled in Wahhabi mosques.
|
yep. and richard reed and zaccharrious massoui were both crashed out at the brixton mosque in london, a steady producer of 70 IQ patsies.
brixton and finsbury mosques are the two most prevalent examples making london a MAJOR hub of international islamic terror.
i have seen many references to london in international intelligence data, as londonistan!
if we were serious aboot the war on terror we'd carpet bomb riyadh and london and stop turning secular states like iraq into terror factories.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
There is a saying...not all Muslims are terrorists, but almost all terrorists are Wahabbists.
|
the major difference between islamic extremists and for example, the christian fundamentalists knocking off abortion doctors, is corporate / governmental organization and funding.
as for wahabbism it was organized and funded intially by the british against the turks like a century ago, and they kept finding uses for it.
no, it doesn't make extremist action #453853 directly briatin's 'fault' but for god's sake, why doesn't anyone question what might be going on now when our government funding used to run all these networks???
the brits were caught red-handed and outed by david shayler, publicly, for paying for an assassination attempt by al-quaeda on quaddafi in lybia, yet this was 'after' the 'big split' between CIA/MI6 and al-quaeda. hmmmm...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure
So I echo your sentiments Looger, whats up with SA?
|
what's up with pakistan? it was in the new york times that mohammad atta received a $100,000 wire transfer directed by Mahmood Ahmed of pakistan's ISI, yet this same man was running around washington dc on 9/11 and for a week after - not arrested, not questioned.
the mumbai bombing is strongly suspected as ISI.
what the $hit is going on here???