View Single Post
Old 07-06-2020, 02:03 PM   #80
IamNotKenKing
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
They’re changing it because he was wrong, we absolutely would have lost ROR to waivers had Colorado not matched, and I imagine they would rather that situation not happen again.
Not this again.

The MOU wording:

All Players on a Club’s Reserve List and Restricted Free Agent List will be exempt from the application of CBA 13.23 Waivers in the case of a mid-season signing.
For further clarity, if Club A trades such a Player to Club B and Club B signs the Player to an SPC, such Player will be exempt from the application of CBA 13.23.


O'Reilly was on "a Club's" Reserve List, being the Avs, thus was exempt from 13.23, which is the waiver requirement.
After the MOU they changed the wording such that the player had to be on the signing Club's Reserve List, thus changing the intent and wording.

Feaster read it correctly at the time. The actual wording was changed. Calgary would not have lost O'Reilly and the picks.

Last edited by IamNotKenKing; 07-06-2020 at 04:38 PM.
IamNotKenKing is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to IamNotKenKing For This Useful Post: