Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleK
You'd be down with a 30% paycut?
I don't think this is as much of a slam dunk as people think it is.
|
I feel like your understanding of the situation is a little off. This protects the players from losing more than 30% in escrow, if it is less than 30% it's what they would have had to pay anyways.
Hell, if next season has to be played without fans the NHL would lose more than $2 billion in revenue and the players would be stuck paying 50%+ in escrow. Suggesting this isn't a huge win for the players is flat out wrong.