Quote:
Originally Posted by Crown Royal
Currently, the acquiring team gets to chose, which IMO is fine for guys like Lucic where he could veto the trade if they don't honor it, but was completely unfair to players whose clauses haven't kicked in yet because it was negotiated into the contract to start at a certain point, they should still get that.
|
In many circumstances, contracts reference effective terms which are in place as of the date of execution of that agreement. I would question if the PA would be doing its job if all existing contracts were subject to terms which are subject to change.
(I imagine that any change to which they would be subject would be the CBA terms as agreed by the parties, and there would be consideration then of existing contracts in force and affected)