I guess it sounds to me like you're ultimately supporting a situation in which anonymous online trolls are actually protected and enabled to increase hateful speech without consequence. It sounds like a situation ideal for amplifying trolling, which actually leads to less civil discussion, worse exchange of ideas and a worse overall experience for the large majority.
I can accept if that's where you're at. It just doesn't seem desirable to me and seems like it inhibits quality exchange of ideas rather than encouraging it.
__________________
"If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?"
|