Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
I think you missed the point of my post. WO403 had the reaction he did because he thought Wallace was still trying to push the narrative of this being a hate crime after the FBI concluded it wasn't. That wasn't what he was doing. Rather, Wallace was just trying to defend himself against the allegations that he had overreacted or made the whole thing up, or tried to mislead people into thinking something innocent was actually sinister. His point wasn't that it actually was sinister, his point was that it was totally understandable for him and his crew to have the reaction they did at the time.
Those different interpretations of the interview fully explain the several pages of argument in here. I was hoping WO403 would see that, and that it would dispel the confusion expressed here:
|
That helps. Thanks.
I was wrong. Again. Oh well. I'll live.