View Single Post
Old 06-10-2020, 06:09 PM   #52
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

IMO you have to look at the trade this way.

Would you rather four years of Lucic at his current salary (net of retention).

Or

2 years of Neal at his salary, then likely a buyout which leaves four more years of dead money.

In that scenario, I take Lucic in a close call.

Does everyone fully understand the expansion facts? There are two scenarios.

Lucic doesn't waive, in which case Flames have to expose someone they didn't want to lose or give up an asset. That would make this a bad trade.

Or Lucic waives and nothing happens. Because Seattle is not claiming him.
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote