View Single Post
Old 02-06-2007, 03:41 PM   #17
Antithesis
Disenfranchised
 
Antithesis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaramonLS View Post
Well its obviously a publicity stunt, they know full well it wont pass, but it does bring up a fair and valid point.
Does it really? I'm not against gay marriage but I don't see how it's a fair or valid point. In a heterosexual marriage, people at least CAN give birth to children that they produced. This is not possible in a homosexual marriage.

It also is a ridiculous statement on other levels: what about those who intend to have children but not within the first three years?

What about those who do try to have children but are not able to for three years?

I understand anything that 'makes the churchies look bad' goes over really well here but I do have to challenge your contention that this is anywhere near a fair or valid point.
Antithesis is offline   Reply With Quote