Quote:
Originally Posted by Bent Wookie
I think what is bothering me is the spinning of the narrative to fit whatever conclusions people hvae drawn and stating it as fact.
Pepsi actually made a great post (aside from the scenario comment at the end as the scenarios can go either way) dissecting what we know and what we don't. AFC responded with a comment making it sounds like he knows what happened or simply can't see it as happening any other way.
In fact, he paints the picture as if he was actually there and has quickly drawn the the conclusion she was shot because she was indigenous and wasn't a threat.
On some level you have to acknowledge that maybe I don't know what happened. Maybe something else happened. Maybe I actually have no clue what I'm talking about. Really.
I can concede that. I have no idea what happened. I have no issue waiting until we hear and see everything. Then, I think I'll be in a better position to have an opinion.
Sent from my HD1905 using Tapatalk
|
I don't pretend to know what happened. However, I would argue that within fixed framework that we know: wellness check, no crime was happening, inhabitant shot in her living room or just outside - I genuinely can't think of any scenario where murder would be justified. Even if buy officer's story, which I don't, I still don't see how it justifies shooting. At first I thought it is common and normal in NA to shoot in those circumstances, but the Texas murder csse shows that it is not.
I am also under impression that she didn't realize he's cop or he didn't realize she lives there, or both.