Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke
In all fairness...I cannot imagine how, even in the context of a biased documentary, anyone could think she didnt have a genuine defamation lawsuit slam-dunk there.
Either way though isnt she just being awarded a parcel of desiccated and worthless land in Oklahoma?
Didnt that other con-artist abscond with all the animals, probably anything worth anything and a whole ton of some other dude's resources and money?
Wooo....land in rural Oklahoma...now she can retire to a life of luxury on her ill-gotten gains....
Granted, it achieves her prime objective....pissing off Joe Dirt.
|
This video goes over the judgement. She got the land and the buildings but not the animals. She also didn’t get her legal fees paid so she’s probably in the red and stuck with some fairly useless property.