Quote:
Originally Posted by Torture
Probably has nothing to do with the fact the coal industry was lobbying the provincial government too, right?  |
You would need to specifically map the acerage that was removed from protection against that map.
Closing campgrounds is not the same as closing protected zones. The UCP did both. So showing a tweet with the two maps overplayed and alluding the the campground closures and zones were part of opening up more land for coal development is misleading.
The UCP might very well be doing what is alleged by that tweet. The tweet just doesn’t show it.