My understanding is the 50-50 split is just for this year, but that doesn't change the fact that the owners are not sharing in good times, but wanting everyone to share in the bad times.
I suppose I just don't understand why it always seems to be the players that are the bad guys when the owners take advantage of them as often as possible. I see nothing unreasonable about they players saying they don't want to make a massive pay cut (ie 50-50 revenue shares) so the owners don't have a bad year when its really the players at risk if anything starts up again.
__________________
Much like a sports ticker, you may feel obligated to read this
|