So CP it sounds to me like you think the majority of Afgahnistan being run by warlords is a slam dunk. Is this the plan the US had from the start? To have elections that reflect one area where there is some control and the rest run by warlords (by the way what about warlords makes you think it's a good thing and thus a success) doesn't seem to me to be a slam dunk. To me either they planned for warlords to rule the place on the whole, which is rediculous, or they didn't plan for it and it's turning out that way and just happens that they may run it less badly than the previous group, the Taliban did. Which shows a lack of planning. Wrong and wrong IMO.
|