Quote:
Originally Posted by Nage Waza
I was very clearly responding to a post that questioned if guns are required when there is no threat to human life. I very clearly pointed out that police brandish guns more or less all the time, so according to them, yes guns are required all the damn time. Is that justified? Im not quite sure.
Very typical to attack a post instead of taking a second to try to understand the context...you are part of the problem.
If an argument is so rock solid, why resort to lies, misquotes or rhetoric?
|
Oh. Ok. So in the context of a couple of knobs trying to say they had to shoot a guy who was committing robberies, trespassing and prowling, you just happened to pick those three actions as requiring guns? Actually I don't know what you're talking about there. I'm not sure you do either. I'm thinking the problem might be idiots with guns thinking they're cops.