View Single Post
Old 05-04-2020, 08:14 AM   #143
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by missdpuck View Post
https://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/...al-phenomenon/

Art Bell had an episode about “rods” and “sky fish” that I caught during one of my bouts of insomnia.

According to the guest they can fly up to 300 mph and disintegrate when captured.

At work the next day we threw “rods” of all sorts at each other.

And here’s a 2013 “sighting” outside Calgary, but it looks like a centipede-like trick of the light for sure:

https://aerial-phenomenon.org/tag/rods/
Rods were debunked years ago.

As it says in the description of that photo, they're nothing more than an optical illusion caused by bugs flying close to a camera and being illuminated by the flash.

Quote:
Object Details: In cryptozoology and outdoor photography, rods (sometimes known as “skyfish” or “solar entities”) are elongated artifacts produced by cameras that inadvertently capture several of a flying insect’s wingbeats. Videos of rod-shaped objects moving quickly through the air were claimed by some to be extraterrestrial life forms or small UFOs, but subsequent experiments showed that these rods appear in film because of an optical illusion/collusion in interlaced video recording.
They only appear in video footage or digital photos taken at night or in dark places because of the way video and digital images are captured. Unlike film, which captures a full image simultaneously, video and digital cameras scan the image from left to right and top to bottom.

This means that the upper left corner of the image was taken slightly earlier than the lower right corner. For most photos, the time difference is not noticeable because the scan happens so quickly and the objects in the image are moving so slowly (or not at all). Images taken in the dark require a longer exposure time (which is why it's hard to take a good photo at night without a tripod). When a small bug flies very close to the camera (especially if there's a flash) during the long exposure, it will be scanned in multiple locations during the same exposure, which creates the odd "rod" appearance.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post: