Quote:
Originally Posted by photon
Why would he? The brain is known to be unreliable, and more credentials doesn't make that less true.
Look at the one video describing the object as going fast over the water, the military guys are convinced of this but a bit of trig with their own instruments shows it to not be true.
Trying to explain every single memory by every person is kind of a waste of time since they don't really count as evidence.
If they do then angels and demons and ghosts all exist too.
|
Let me rephrase my question...
We use eye witness accounts when trying to convict people of crimes or in car accidents and other things, but here you say here it doesn't count or matter.
We should trust one persons explanation of the video and say it's a shut and closed case? Or is what Fravor and 3 other pilots saw, which defies the law of science and physics, we should out right dismiss what they saw and say it faulty memory?
Just trying to understand your logic here.
Even if we accept the false readings, these UFO's were being investigated and tracked on radar by other Navy ships long before Fravor and his crew came on the scene.
Shouldn't we be collecting more data from the DOD and doing a further investigation?