Quote:
Originally Posted by btimbit
We know he wasn't a legal firearms owner but can you remember if it said he did have a license at one point? If that's the case I'm really curious if the weapons used were his own that he purchased with a license that he lost 18 years ago. That'd be a pretty damning oversight of the system and I'd be pretty pissed to hear it
|
They didn't say anything about that. But that would be a law enforcement issue instead of a legislative issue.
I always thought that if the courts imposed a no fire arms condition, that there would be an enforcement order to take the guns into custody. If the police failed to do that, or the courts failed to do that, yeah, I'll be really upset at that.