Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion
Flash, Ranheim wore 26 for five games. He's a 28, not a 26. 26 is not his number at all. It's like saying Dave Rittich is the best #40 in Flames history because he wore it to development camp and was good enough to get the opportunity to switch to 33.
I voted for Stone because he's the best 26 I've seen. Reichel was probably a better player but I've heard enough about his supposed deficiencies that I'm not comfortable voting for him sight unseen.
But voting for Ranheim for 26 makes less than zero sense. Stone has played here four years in that number. Ranheim barely wore it for a week as a rookie.
|
If Paul Ranheim had 1 game at 26 he would still be a better place to put a vote than Stone.