Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99
Interesting as my recollection/interpretation was just the opposite.
But I agree neither guy gives me the warm fuzzies as a #1 at this point and we have a large enough sample size on both to draw conclusions.
|
Had a look at the numbers and it's razor thin.
Rittich xGAA was 2.355
Talbot xGAA was 2.34
so that suggests Talbot had the team play slightly better in front of him, but it also shows why we differ as it was a virtual tie.