Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
Because there would have been an argument he was let go for cause, in which case he gets zero. Also an argument the other way. So you settle.
My guess? 50-50
|
I think that is very, very unlikely. That would have been a delicate argument for the Flames to make given these things occurred prior to him being under contract with the club. No doubt both sides signed confidentiality agreements and releases, but IMO I doubt he would have given up on two years of pay so quickly.