View Single Post
Old 02-24-2020, 10:34 AM   #125
Hot_Flatus
#1 Goaltender
 
Hot_Flatus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Uranus
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG View Post
I think BMI doesn’t work at taller heights. The squared height doesn’t seem to add enough wait. 136 at 6’ would have to be unhealthy.
BMI is flawed in the sense that it doesn't account for muscle mass. Anyone who is active and physically fit/athletic, is going to trend higher on the BMI scale and this doesn't mean they are unhealthy. BMI is a good ballpark indicator, but should really only be looked at it as a part of the entire package of data of ones physical well being.

6' at 136 vs 6' at 180 is a pretty realistic range of comparison for someone who is physically fit and active (i.e. has some muscle mass) vs some who is sedentary but practicing a reasonably healthy lifestyle (little muscle mass but has good dietary habits).
__________________
I hate to tell you this, but I’ve just launched an air biscuit

Last edited by Hot_Flatus; 02-24-2020 at 10:40 AM.
Hot_Flatus is offline   Reply With Quote