Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion
Miller wasn't a great fit in Tampa Bay, though. Swapping Miller for Coleman kind of feels slightly reminiscent of the Lucic/Neal swap, honestly. Vancouver got a more expensive scorer with more production who bolstered their top-six while Tampa gets a cheaper guy more suited to a scrappy depth role and still produce in more limited minutes.
|
That’s a stretch. Miller wasn’t traded for Coleman. Coleman is 28, scoring 21 goals this year making 1.8 for this year and next. Miller is 26, scored 13 for before getting traded and is making 5.25 for this and the next three years.
What’s there to compare to Lucic/Neal swap?