View Single Post
Old 02-13-2020, 11:29 PM   #55
the2bears
Franchise Player
 
the2bears's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Bay Area
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caged Great View Post
2 top 9 forwards + maybe a depth forward (I would be assuming Bennett and maybe another depth forward gets traded in those deals)

I'm assuming another full time D-man like Martinez + another potential depth guy in case of stupidity with the injuries or if they deal a young guy like Kylington.

Both the depth guys would be like Shore or Fantenberg etc.

3 good players + 2 depth.

I don't think we have the pieces to deal for the parts we need (good players) without eating some of the players we have on the NHL team.
I'm still not buying it. I think we definitely could use (really use) a top 6 RW, but obtaining one would help adjust the rest of the forward group so they're playing in roles better suited for them.

But you originally said we're 5 good players short. You count 2 depth players in your 5, one a forward because you assume we trade another one away. So we're not short that player, we're replacing them.

I think we're short a piece or two, but not nearly as bad as you think.
the2bears is offline   Reply With Quote