Quote:
Originally Posted by Looger
independent? for god's sake, how aboot the scientists themselves???
6 billion or so...
the obvious one: the fact that it's all the same group at the top and all that 'the masons' or 'the jesuits' or 'the joooos' or 'the club of malta' or 'the vatican' or 'the black pope' or <insert easy answer here> is a big pile of dog crap, spouted by maniacs and morons that are trotted out to 'represent all those crazy conspiracy theorists' in the mainstream media.
what can i tell you? if you're interested you'll check out more sources, if you're not then you won't.
science is NOT a consensus, but media attention sure can be. simple as that.
pay a bunch of figurehead scientists to explore a limited list of causes and quite soon you'll discover that your suspicions are correct! how amazing!
meanwhile scientists that aren't on the panel that have been studying solar cycles for their careers don't get consulted. hmmmm...
|
I don't think you get it I didn't just read newspaper articles I did in depth study for like a year on human effects on global warming I was at college libraries pulling studies and reading them. Sure I did read some media articles, but I was doing all I could to find sources that said we don't cause global warming because 1/2 the time that was the side of the debate I was on. Sure there were some studies out there, but if I went by a study by study basis I would say the ratio was somewhere around 30 to 1 for human caused warming. Now I understand that some might lean towards the consensus just to be in that position but it wouldn't account for that kind of discrepancy...