Quote:
Originally Posted by Looger
...not sure how'd they'd get less money when they can always just spike the prices with a war, i've heard estimates as high as $250 / bbl from economists if iran retaliates by mining oil tanker pathways...
money... isn't really the endgame of any of these agendas, it's control. they print the money! the money is largely virtual anyway, it's probably more valuable as a means of monitoring and datamining to 'the elites' than actual cash that they can just crank out at will anyway.
it's the mechanism, the excuse, the idea that all this regulation is necessary. control.
i addressed this earlier in the thread, i think at the end of page 2. they can easily be unwknowing dupes and simply devoted to their cause. one wonders why guys such as suzuki, whom i've personally witnessed lying through his teeth, would have any credibility whatsoever were they not promoted by owned and controlled media.
as for gore he's a political player and he receives marching orders from the trilateral commission or the council on foreign relations or the bilderberg group or whatever, the top guys are members of at least two of those three.
|
Does different driving habits lead inevitably to "more control"? Why are so many "elites" against this form of control.
I can think of a few of these "elites" who have actively campaigned and fought against environmental regulations that are fell less severe than anything you are suggesting. Are they on the wrong page? Steven Harper and George Bush are clearly against this form of control. Either that or they are really good actors and they have a whole wack of powerful people really stumped.
I still don't get it. Say your scenario goes exactly as you say it will and at the end everyone drives less or uses less gas -- then some shadowy figure says "ah ha, now we've really got 'em". So what? Like what's the difference? They have more control over me how? What for? That's a pretty goddamn elaborate scheme to get me to drive less. And for a crowd that controls everything and calls all the shots, if they want us to drive less so they have "more control", why bother with this whole charade? You say "it's the mechanism", well it's a pretty shabby mechanism as far as I can tell. It's been mechanising for twenty years and we still aren't anywhere near a global mile tax.