Well written decision. I don't see much for the SCC to do here either.
Although the veto issue has been decided in the past, it keeps rearing its ugly head. This FCA decision spells out very well that any attempt at gaining a veto by using mechanisms that aren't called a veto but act as one, won't fly.
Also, the FCA was pretty clear that: 1) this appeal was limited to only those aspects of the consultation that were not up to standard in the first decision, 2) the applicants were not allowed to re-litigate issues around consultation that was considered appropriate and 3) the applicants couldn't introduce new issues to litigate that they failed to raise earlier.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
|