I think that’s a weird question to be asking or perhaps I have a fundamentally different concept of what a job is. In my opinion your employer pays you to add value to the company and the management team with potentially your input will give you tasks to maximize your value to the company. Your duty would be to only identify tasks which you feel you do not have the expertise to do or which you doing would create a risk to the company or public.
Your compensation is negotiated between you and your employer and if it is insufficient you leave and go elsewhere.
To me the idea that you are hired to only perform a specific set of tasks for a specific amount of compensation is wrong. Now if you are refusing because it would require additional unpaid time and affect your QOL outside of work then that could be reasonable but really factors into the compensation vs new job.
If you don’t take on the additional work I’d suspect your opportunity to advance with the company would be limited.
|