View Single Post
Old 01-18-2020, 07:05 PM   #149
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimdon View Post
And indent believe that the level of play from our top players in indicative of the coaching that they are getting.
Well some people look at it one way, some look at it another.

I can give you some examples of what I think are problems with the play that are coachable.
- the length of time players are individually holding on to the puck before moving it
- individual rushes through neutral zone into opposition traffic leading to turnovers
- D to D in the own zone until wingers are stationary at far blue line (covered in the event of a pass, and unable to beat the D to a dump in because they are standing still) and the subsequent turnovers

There are more, but each of these things related to decision making and are coachable

It is a team that appears to be playing with no plan

Backlund is not a winger. I know they want Lindholm to play C but with this roster, they need him more on wing

Mangiapane is not a top line player. Love the heart he has, and he skates hard, but at this point in his development he is a bottom 6 player. Even Ferland got returned to the bottom 6 when he was spending some time with 13/23 and cooled down

I don’t know why you wouldn’t look at the coach and be comfortable asking questions
DeluxeMoustache is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to DeluxeMoustache For This Useful Post: