Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher
It would be extremely bad asset management to move them for minimal returns and then have them turn into valuable NHLers. It's not about emotional ties, its about asset management. You can't give them away for little to nothing.
So Treliving has to set an appropriate price for them and not move them for any significantly lower than that. That would be smart asset management, smart managing.
|
That's not really asset management, asset management looks at the big picture, opportunity costs, risks and the whole package of your assets.
That's fixating on a single asset instead of managing your assets systematically.
Asset management includes the impact on players who would be replacing them and what impact more time could have on those players and the team's success overall.
It also includes what you would do with the excess money and how that could be applied to other assets.
Asset management is looking at the cumulation of all of this, fixating on the single player and what they could become is the exact opposite of asset management.