I think the issue I have having to read all the posts picking apart the Flames after a win, is that when the Flames lose, but play a good game and maybe didn't get the result they deserved or the breaks..........all that gets said is things like "no room for moral victories", "all that matters is the result", "this is a result oriented business", "have to find a way", "not good enough".......etc...
So why only after a win, are honest comments about the game allowed, but not some honest analysis after a loss? Seems like all that counts is the result only applies if they lose, if they win it also has to be about "how they won".
|