Quote:
Originally Posted by TheIronMaiden
I think that this viewpoint is valid, but it is dependent on two things -
First, is that Valimaki will be back at an NHL level before, or just after the deadline.
Second, is that Brodie or Hamonic as pure rentals will bring in a 2nd round pick or better. (also it is bizarre that you think Hamonic sucks, but is also coveted)
If both of these are true, then trading one of the UFAs is a valid option. If one or neither is true then it make no sense.
BT, in the past has brought in D-depth at the trade deadline to try and avoid a disaster at towards the end of the season. If the Flames were comfortably in 1st, or clearly going to miss, the trades might happen. Because the Flames will be playing in they will need all hands on deck. It has been a while since the Flames have had bad D-depth, so we forget that we are missing out on.
|
I think Hamonic brings a lot of intangibles that teams covet and has carried his reputation of being a warrior and good team guy with him which I think both are valid. What I didn’t say is that he sucks. He was never worth what Treliving paid for him in a trade and I don’t think he is the difference between making/missing the playoffs or winning a round. He was a nightmare in the playoffs last year and if he was a better player he would already be extended. He doesn’t suck but I think the hype/reputation outweigh the actual results.
At the end of the day this group has not been successful enough to have this org so thin at the prospect base. We have nothing coming up on the farm for Dmen. The Flames have a chance to change their window over the next year. Keeping and losing Brodie/Hamonic in free agency ensures this window is getting closer to closing than opening imo.