Quote:
Originally Posted by Leeman4Gilmour
Okay, fine, I'm not done with you  . Nothing snarky about any reply...that's what the big smile was for. To alleviate any concerns about being snarky. A lot of people think emoji's are silly. I find them useful in establishing the intended tone of a statement or question. |
That's fair and It is early so I did jump the gun!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leeman4Gilmour
Absolutely, the terminal work and pipeline work generate different concerns. In my opinion, the host of reasons @ the terminal would generate more concern. Hence the question. CC suggested the protesters are waiting for a certain segment of the work to begin prior to unveiling their coup de gras. If not the work which could directly affect marine life, then why the pipelines? I'm genuinely curious.
Edit; "Anyway, you're not helpful and unless you choose to be, I'm done with you."....that was a snarky reply. I take it back.
|
I just think the location and general design of the terminal work doesn't lead to a very good protest. They wore out their welcome with the City of Burnaby pretty quickly.
Now, when they are building the pipeline on actual traditional lands that are undeveloped, with multiple access routes, in the middle of no where thats when the big protests will strike IMO.