Quote:
Originally Posted by Weitz
You made a snarky comment implying something that didn't make sense. So I gave you a snarky reply.
There are a host of reasons that work being completed at the terminals is different than that of actually laying the new pipe and why the actual pipe laying is going to garner a significantly higher level of protest. Lets not forget there have been protests at the Burnaby facility.
|
Okay, fine, I'm not done with you
. Nothing snarky about any reply...that's what the big smile was for. To alleviate any concerns about being snarky. A lot of people think emoji's are silly. I find them useful in establishing the intended tone of a statement or question.
Absolutely, the terminal work and pipeline work generate different concerns. In my opinion, the host of reasons @ the terminal would generate more concern. Hence the question. CC suggested the protesters are waiting for a certain segment of the work to begin prior to unveiling their coup de gras. If not the work which could directly affect marine life, then why the pipelines? I'm genuinely curious.
Edit; "Anyway, you're not helpful and unless you choose to be, I'm done with you."....that was a snarky reply. I take it back.