Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher
If they wanted to pay him all of it they would have just fired him. Clearly they settled for something less than all of it. Use some logic friend.
|
Needlessly condescending.
But let’s put it another way, if they wanted to “fire him”, or relieve him of his duties they could have done so at a cost.
There’s also more at play than that though. Peters could argue he suffered other damages as a result of Calgary “firing” him, beyond what they owed him. As it stands now, he doesn’t have much of case against Calgary. From what has been said publicly, Flames reviewed the incident but came to no conclusion publicly. Peters resigned. The Flames haven’t said a thing about him. It’s entirely possible the Flames wanted the least exposure possible and that’s why they took this route and so maybe paid him out nearly everything?