Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
Just to expand on my own post. Here's how I would handle this if I was structuring the news lineup for this.
Story 1
- Peters no longer with the team
- He's resigned
- Ward new coach
- Clips from Tree
Story 2
- Did the Flames handle this correctly
- Interview with a legal expert
- Why is this is resignation instead of a firing?
Story 3
- What does this mean for hockey culture going forward
- Interview with coaching expert, sports psychologist, someone like that
Coming up in sports
- Story focused on Ryan Ward and what it means for the team going forward
Something like that. You cover the story from multiple angles leveraging experts in each area.
Having a bunch of hockey experts trying to talk about non hockey things is poor coverage.
|
In reality we’ll get a bunch of articles addressing whether outrage/cancel culture has gone too far.
“Reactions” from around the league.
Multiple talking heads offering their takes on the process and at least of few of these morons virtue signalling, going on about how much better Tre could have handled it, how it is a black mark on the league and how this will be a new age for hockey as the abuse reckoning takes shape.
More speculation from the talking heads as to the possible implications for the league and how teams/coaches are watching this carefully for the next time a decade old racist tirade comes to light.
Got all 3 just for you Rando.