Quote:
Originally Posted by Lubicon
Why would it be eye opening? We do not have to condone his actions (and should not) but accepting an apology is fine - assuming it is genuine. His actions and his apology are two very different things. Doesn't mean you agree with what he did.
|
I suppose that’s true, but even the letter did come off as insincere when he refused to acknowledge Akim, and it was openly made public as opposed to the letter actually being sent to Treliving. It was quite obvious it was less of an apology and more of a PR action to save his reputation.
I figured more Calgarians saw through that, even if they were Sun readers