Quote:
Originally Posted by Leeman4Gilmour
Big picture, might not be a bad thing. Having a precedent out there where one could get terminated with cause for actions which occurred long before one was employed with the company wanting to terminate, could open an ugly window.
Before this is construed as me supporting Peters' actions or even think it's just he may end up getting paid, it is not. Again, big picture is what I'm thinking.
|
It might not matter on precedent. I forgot who said it yesterday (maybe Burke?) it is likely all future NHL coaching and executive contracts will have clauses allowing for termination with cause if incidents from the past like this about the coach/executive come to light.
Peters might luck out because he will be the first.