Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
FWIW Chris Johnston on 960 said that based on the people he is talking to, it "feels like" it will be unlikely the Flames will be able to fire Peters with cause. This means the Flames will be on the hook for paying out the rest of the contract.
|
Big picture, might not be a bad thing. Having a precedent out there where one could get terminated with cause for actions which occurred long before one was employed with the company wanting to terminate, could open an ugly window.
Before this is construed as me supporting Peters' actions or even think it's just he may end up getting paid, it is not. Again, big picture is what I'm thinking.