Quote:
Originally Posted by combustiblefuel
Elaborate..
|
You doubt Aliu's credibility despite the following: (1) he has no known history of dishonesty; (2) he has a demonstrated history of telling the truth in difficult circumstances (blowing the whistle on hazing); (3) he has no apparent motive to lie; (4) his account was apparently independently corroborated by at least two other witnesses; and (5) you haven't identified a single relevant reason to doubt his credibility.
You also refer to Peter's statements as "a poor choice of words" (which is, to say the least, something of an understatement).
I don't know why you did these things in your post. However, because of all of this, I find it difficult to take your post seriously. Does that help?