Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
As others have mentioned probably a legal strategy.
The Forbes article I linked in the other thread said that one of the possible ways that Peters could defend himself against termination with cause and keep getting paid is to argue that the incident took place such a long time ago that it had no effect on his employment with the Flames.
|
Fair enough, that does make sense and I should have known better.
Still annoys me though
