Quote:
Originally Posted by KootenayFlamesFan
That 'a decade ago' line really bugs the hell out of me. He really should have left that out, not helping his cause at all.
|
As others have mentioned probably a legal strategy.
The Forbes article I linked in the other thread said that one of the possible ways that Peters could defend himself against termination with cause and keep getting paid is to argue that the incident took place such a long time ago that it had no effect on his employment with the Flames.