I'm a bit confused about why people think it's obvious he should be fired for something he did long, long before he was employed by the team. Does that just make no difference as far as you all are concerned?
I don't really care if he's fired as I don't think he's shown himself to be a particularly good coach, but this does seem like an odd standard for firing people.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
|