Quote:
Originally Posted by Corral
Thanks for the clarification Brad.
Some of you are willfully blind with your rosy glasses when it comes to scrutiny on the home team.
Glad I don’t pay thousands for the privilege of watching this in person.
|
I don’t see how this level of condescending is helpful. Grow up.
If we assume the most likely scenario is true, then we should assume that Treliving did not know about the Akim situation. By the same token, we can also assume that Treliving knew Bill’s reputation. There’s not much wrong with the latter, considering how deeply embedded this is in hockey culture.
This is not rosy/blindness/whatever. This is just assuming the most likely situation is the true one. There’s worthy scrutiny here, but we don’t have to reach.