Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
I don't think Calgary ownership would have allowed a 50% retained deal.
|
I don’t understand how swapping Neal for Lucic is any different than a 50% deal from an ownership standpoint. If it was my money I’d much prefer to save the money on Neal and pay an actual NHL replacement than pay Lucic what he’s getting. If that is true it just goes more to my feelings about poor leadership and culture surrounding this team that starts right at the top and filters down.